Articles & Additional Information
von Foerster, Marilyn Miller, PT, MA “BACKPACK SAFETY: AN OXYMORON”
As backpack use for school has become widespread, numerous articles and programs have offered instruction and guidelines in “backpack safety”. Nevertheless, the incidence of backpack-related pain and injury continues to rise and has reached epidemic proportions. Click here to download the article.
von Foerster, Marilyn Miller, PT, MA “Back Health and School Chairs”
A school chair must allow and support proper sitting posture of a neutral pelvis and upright trunk and head. This is done with a chair that has the following features: (1) Seat platform level (no forward or backward tilt), but may be molded (2) Backrest with lumbar support, and vertical, with spring or give for some movement. The backrest should not be reclined or posterior to seat platform. See Illustrations and Video…
von Foerster, M.: Our Kids, Backpacks, and the Back Epidemic. Orthopaedic Practice, Vol. 15;3:03
This article was written in 2003, before the BackTpack was created. Von Foerster had been concerned about the issue of backpacks and posture of school children. She was invited to contribute her observations and suggestions to the American Physical Therapy Association’s Orthopaedic Section journal which was doing a focus issue on the backpack problem. This article includes analysis of the problem and suggestions of solutions at home, at school, and with public policy. Click here to download the article.
Kimberly D. Dahl, He Wang, Jennifer K. Popp, D. Clark Dickin, “Load distribution and postural changes in young adults when wearing a traditional backpack versus the BackTpack” Gait & Posture (March 2016) Volume 45, Pages 90-96. Click her to view the abstract.
Kimberly D. Dahl, Henry Wang, and D. Clark Dickin of Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA : Abstract of Presentation at the 2015 American Society for Biomechanics, “Postural Changes in Young Adults When Wearing a Traditional Backpack Versus the BackTpack” Click here to view the article.
Valérie Lavigne, DC, “Weight limit recommendation in backpack use for school-aged children” Journal of Clinical Chiropractic Pediatrics, Volume 14, No. 2, March. Click here to view the article.
Frances Kistner, PT, PhD, CEAS; Ira Fiebert, PT, PhD; Kathryn Roach, PT, PhD; James Moore, PT, PhD “Postural Compensations and Subjective Complaints Due to Backpack Loads and Wear Time in Schoolchildren” Pediatr Phys Ther 2013;25:15–24. Click here to view the article.
M Ramprasad, Jeba Alias and AK Raghuveer “Effect of Backpack Weight on Postural Angles in Preadolescent Children” (2009)
Carrying a backpack weighing 15% of body weight change all the postural angles in preadolescent children. Click here to view the study.
von Foerster, Marilyn Miller, PT, MA “Student Test of Back-T-Pack.” (2004)
BackTpack®to 40 middle-school students between the ages of 11 and 14, and monitored their reports of pain and postural changes compared with conventional backpack use. Click here to view the study.
Siambanes, David, DO, Martinez, Jason A, MA, Butler, Edgar W., PhD and Haider, Thomas, MD. “Influence of School Backpacks on Adolescent Back Pain.” Pediatric Orthopedics (March/April 2004)
Johnson J, King C. “Backpain prevalence correlated with adolescent backpack use.” Unpublished doctoral thesis. Forest Grove, OR: Pacific University. (2003)
Lamar S, Yu B. “The effect of backpack weight on forward trunk lean in school-age children: A two-dimensional videographic analysis.” Phys Ther Case Rep. (2000) 3 (1): 28-31.
Pascoe DD, Pascoe DE, Wang YT, Shim D, Dim CK. “Influence of carrying book bags on gait cycle and posture of youths.” Ergonomics. (1997) 40(6): 631-641.
Volume 27, Issue 5, October 1996, Pages 315-320
Ergonomic investigation of letter-carrier satchels: Part II. Biomechanical laboratory study
C. Joe Lin*, Patrick G. Dempsey, †, , James L. Smith†, M. M. Ayoub† and Tracey M. Bernard§
* Chung Yuan Christian University, Department of Industrial Engineering, Chung Li, Taiwan
† Liberty Mutual Research Center for Safety & Health, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA
§ Murray State University, Department of Occupational Safety & Health, Murray, KY 42071, USA
Received 10 May 1995. Available online 17 February 1999.
A biomechanical investigation of four satchels designed for the purposes of manually carrying and delivering mail was conducted. Twenty United States Postal Service carriers participated in the study. The satchels differed primarily in the presence/absence of a waist belt, the number and design of the shoulder straps, and the number of pouches. The biomechanical analyses were comprised of postural (shoulder and hip) deviation measurements, estimated compressive forces at the l5/s1 joint, soft tissue pressure on the shoulder, spinal torsion during mail retrieval, force distribution between the feet, and an anthropometric evaluation. The results indicated that a satchel with two shoulder straps and two pouches was more desirable than the single-pouch satchels from a biomechanics standpoint.
*International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Volume 23, Issue 4, 15 March 1999, Pages 269-279
Evaluation of satchels for postal letter carriers
M. M. Ayoub* and James L. Smith
Institute for Ergonomics Research, Department of Industrial Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-3061, USA
A research project funded by the United States Postal Service surveyed letter carriers to evaluate three alternative satchel designs and the current satchel. The evaluation consisted of both field surveys and a laboratory study. Each satchel had positive and negative attributes. A two-pouch system (satchel C) that distributed weight on both sides of the body, proved to be the best alternative in the laboratory study.However, concerns regarding the use of satchel C for defense against a dog attack made its desirability questionable in the survey. The study showed that none of the four satchels was a universally accepted alternative. Recommendations are offered to improve the satchel design.
The study examines four satchel designs that were evaluated for the US Postal Service. Similar techniques could be used to evaluate industrial designs for tools, equipment, clothing, or other work items.
Harreby M, Neergarrd Ke, Hesselsoe G, et al. “Are radiographic changes in the thoracic and lumbar spine of adolescents risk factors for low back pain in adults?” Spine. (1995) 20:2298-2302.
Miller M, Medeiros J. “Recruitment of Internal Oblique and Transversus Abdominis Muscles During the Eccentric Phase of the Curl-Up Exercise.” The Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association
(August 1987) 67(8). Click here to view the study.